Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good & Broken
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 23:07, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Good & Broken (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Band does not appear to be notable. Eeekster (talk) 23:31, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:25, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 14:46, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - at least in its current form, info in article is way too skimpy. Note that the automatic GSearch you get from hitting the link above brings up many hits for the Miley Cyrus song of the same title. Try this on Google: "Good & Broken" + "Toronto". That search reveals little more than self-built networking pages, which is fine for launching their career but does not confer notability. So far, it will suffice to mention the band in the page for the obscure reality show in which they are supposedly being featured. Doomsdayer520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:13, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:30, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I tried various searches based on the band members' names (for example) but was not able to find any sources that would help to establish WP:N notability. Delete unless sources are forthcoming by the end of this deletion discussion. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 02:49, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. —Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 02:53, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.